jones2007automatic Automatic summarising: The state of the art by Karen Sparck Jones.

Karen Sparck Jones. Automatic summarising: The state of the art.
Information Processing & Management, 43(6):1449, 1481, 2007.

 INTRODUCTION
1. Something new/novel (e.g. algorithm, method, technique)? (Y/N)
2. Paper readability/understandability (e.g. not full of mathematical formulas)? (easy, moderate, difficult)
3. Interesting material? (No, Enough, Very)
4. Detail enough? (Y/N)
5. Google Scholar citation count: counting mount, date of publication:
6. Publisher tier: 1/2/3/NA
7. IE task: NER, Relation extraction etc

CONTENT
1. Background
2. Description in brief the core content, something new proposed by the authors
3. Corpus used
4. Evaluation metric used
5. Performance, compare with others
6. The strength and weakness of core content (according to authors)
7. Future works
8. Misc

COMMENTS ETC
1. Interesting stuffs
2. Strength and Weakness of the method/algorithms proposed
3. Critiques on: experiment (corpus used, performance, evaluation metric, etc), concepts etc
4. Relation with my research
5. Resources (web page, corpus, implementation/tool/code) related to the paper